Connect with us
Advertisement
Advertisement

News

MP appalled by fracking decision

Avatar

Published

on

Nia Griffith: “I am strongly opposed to the government’s proposed weakening of fracking regulations”

Nia Griffith: “I am strongly opposed to the government’s proposed
weakening of fracking regulations”

NIA GRIFFITH, Llanelli Labour MP and Shadow Secretary of State for Wales, spoke with us at The Herald about her opposition to the plans to begin fracking under national parks and protected areas this week. Both Stephen Crabb and Simon Hart were amongst the 298 Members of Parliament who voted in favour of allowing fracking under national parks and protected areas on Wednesday (Dec 16). Hydraulic fracturing, known as “fracking”, is the process of drilling and injecting fluid into the ground at a high pressure to fracture shale rocks to releases their natural gases. In Parliament, MPs voted to allow fracking for shale gas 1,200m below national parks and other protected sites.

Although fracking could give us access to more gas and oil, while decreasing our dependency on foreign oil, the fracking process is incredibly controversial. The main concerns are that the fracking process is highly water intensive, increasing the risk of drought, and that a huge amount of chemicals are used in the process. Up to 600 chemicals are used in fracking fluid, including known carcinogens and toxins, which contaminate nearby groundwater. Hydraulic fracking does produce approximately 300,000 barrels of natural gas a day, but there are a number of environmental and health hazards involved in the process. The plans to allow fracking in protected areas reverse the promise, made in January under the Coalition Government, that fracking would be banned from such places. At the time, the then undersecretary of state for climate change, Amber Rudd, told Parliament it had been agreed that there would be “an outright ban on fracking in national parks and sites of special scientific interest.” Lisa Nandy, the current shadow energy and climate secretary, said that the government were using “a parliamentary back door to put through these weak regulations without a proper debate” and said that they were going against their word that there would be “tougher safeguards” on fracking until it was proven safe.

While 298 MPs voted in favour of the regulations, 261 MPS voted against them, including Nia Griffith and Plaid Cymru MP for Carmarthen East and Dinefwr, Jonathan Edwards. We at The Herald spoke to Ms Griffith about her vote against fracking under protected areas and she said: “I am strongly opposed to the government’s proposed weakening of fracking regulations and l voted against it yesterday (Dec 16). “The hypocrisy of David Cameron mouthing fine words at the Climate Change summit and then coming back to push the fracking regulations through, whilst slashing subsidies to renewables is appalling. “I look forward to decisions on fracking being devolved to the Welsh Government in the forthcoming Wales Bill, which should give us the opportunity to protect our National Parks and other areas of beauty here in Wales.” Explaining in more detail, she added: “Earlier this year, although we do not have the numbers to defeat the Government, Labour did manage to secure a series of amendments to the Infrastructure Bill that put in place a series of environmental safeguards which had to be met before shale gas drilling could go ahead. This included a ban of fracking in areas where drinking water is collected and protected sensitive areas such as our national parks or important wildlife sites.

“However, just weeks after agreeing to these amendments, the government did a complete U-turn in the Lords sneaking through a weakened version of Labour’s protections. In the Commons we tried to reinstate our more stringent safeguards. However the Tories used parliamentary procedures to ensure that the debate overran so MPs were denied the opportunity to reverse those changes. “On Tuesday, October 26 the government once again pushed through these weakened fracking regulations through a parliamentary backdoor (ie. a legislative committee) with no opportunity for the majority of MPs to debate them – just the vote yesterday (Dec 16). “Now these weakened fracking regulations have been passed, shale gas drilling will be allowed in drinking water protection zones, important wildlife sites, as well as under the ground below protected areas such as national parks, areas of outstanding national beauty and world heritage sites. “We as Labour MPs believe Britain must pursue a socially-just energy policy that considers the impact on the environment and climate change, as well the need for a secure, affordable energy. The Government must listen to people’s worries and not railroad through changes to the legislation which may have damaging and long lasting effects on our natural environment.” We contacted both Stephen Crabb and Simon Hart regarding their vote in favour of fracking under protected areas, but neither of them replied before the Herald went to print.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

The latest increase in coronavirus in Wales is ‘sobering’ says First Minister

Avatar

Published

on

THE FIRST MINISTER, Mark Drakeford has criticised the lack of communication with the UK government as he gave a briefing on what he described as the “sobering” increase in coronavirus cases and hospitalisation in Wales.

The infection rate in Wales has risen to 23.6 infections for every 100k people as cases have spiked in areas including Merthyr, Rhondda Cynon Taf, Caerphilly and Newport.

Hospitalisations remain low but are rising, with five people currently in intensive care with Covid-19 and and 53 Covid patients on all hospital wards, according to the latest data from Public Health Wales from Sunday, September 13.

Mr Drakeford said that the number of people in hospital with coronavirus had risen to 41 with four people in intensive care.

He also said that the R number in Wales was almost certainly now above one – meaning the virus is spreading exponentially again. The latest estimate, he said, was between 0.7 and 1.2.

Mr Drakeford said: “In this most difficult week, there has been no meeting offered to First Ministers of any sort. Since the 28 May, there has been just one brief telephone call from the Prime Minister.

“This is simply unacceptable to anyone who believes that we ought to be facing the coronavirus crisis together.

“We need a regular, reliable, rhythm of engagement: a reliable meeting even once a week would be a start. I make this argument not because we should all do the same things, but because being round the same table allows each of us to make the best decisions for the nations we represent.

“There is a vacancy at the heart of the United Kingdom, and it needs urgently to be filled, so we can talk to each other, share information, pool ideas and demonstrate a determination that the whole of the country can face these challenges together at this most difficult time.”

Continue Reading

News

Trade deal won’t benefit Wales

Avatar

Published

on

EVERY week, the Herald carries political opinion pieces from across Wales’ principal political parties.

This week, Jonathan Edwards MP casts an eye over the trade deal between the UK and Japan announced this week and wonders ‘What’s in it for Wales?’

Jonathan Edwards writes: THE BUNTING was on full display in Westminster this week as the British Government announced that it had reached the holy grail of signing its first post-Brexit international trade deal.  

The agreement with Japan was described by Secretary of State Liz Truss as a ‘major moment in our national history’.  As major moments go, a casual look at the detail leaves a lot to be desired.  Effectively all the British Government has achieved is to replicate a deal UK business already benefited from as part of the EU-Japan trade deal signed in 2019.

The British Government admit that over a 15-year period the deal will only increase UK economic wealth by 0.07%.  However, under the rules of Brexit political discourse never let the facts get in the way for an excuse to sing Rule Britannia and wave the Union Jack.

During the debate in the Commons, I highlighted that the British Government’s own figures indicate in a best-case scenario it would take 71 deals of this nature to make up for the British Governments strategy for the second phase of Brexit of leaving the EU Single Market and Customs Union.  If we no deal at the end of the year the situation would be considerably worse.

For Wales, the economic benefits are projected to be less than even the negligible UK figures with the deal only expected to benefit the Welsh economy by a measly 0.05%.  The same goes for other trade deals currently being negotiated by the British Government.

Capitulating on chlorinated chicken in the US Trade deal could only benefit the Welsh economy by 0.05% over 15 years according to an excellent Senedd Research paper.  

The New Zealand and Australia deals, according to the same paper, could have a 0% impact on the Welsh economy.  

Never again can the Tories claim to be the party of business: what we are witnessing is economic madness.

The agricultural provisions in the Japan deal further fuels my fears that our farmers will be the proverbial sacrificial lambs in these trade negotiations.  True there was progress on Geographical Indicators, but the British Government failed to secure any tariff rate quotas for food products.  Instead, our farmers will only be able to utilise unused quotas by the European Union.  

Let that sink in.  

In the real world, effectively. EU export policy will determine what can be exported from the UK.

The Secretary of State emphasised that the Japan deal paved the way for entry to the Trans-Pacific Partnership.  A free trade area consisting of 11 countries (down from 12 after the US pulled out).  

What the British Government are reluctant to reveal is that the TPP contains strict rules on State Aid and also includes an investor-state dispute resolution mechanism which would supersede UK domestic law.  These are the same two areas, of course, that have led to the breakdown in the second phase Brexit negotiations currently ongoing.

At the end of the day, the two great Brexit era slogans of ‘take back control’ and ‘global Britain’ are completely incompatible and inherently contradictory.

As UK international trade policy develops these inconsistencies will become apparent to all.

Continue Reading

News

Plans for Llanelli’s first ever virtual Christmas carnival

Avatar

Published

on

LLANELLI Christmas Carnival will not be held this year, for the first time in its 42-year history.

Partners have confirmed that the decision has been made in line with current Welsh Government guidance and increasing concerns about the spread of coronavirus linked to large gatherings.

However, plans are afoot to celebrate Christmases past and present in the town’s first ever virtual carnival.

On what would have been ‘carnival night’ the town’s illuminations will be switched on and an online celebration will be hosted on Carmarthenshire County Council’s social media channels featuring music, opportunity to reminisce over past carnivals and a challenge to businesses and organisations to create a carnival scene for the town’s first ever virtual parade.

The town’s Christmas tree is also being relocated to a more visible location for passers-by, at the busy Gelli-Onn junction near West End.

The largest Christmas carnival in Wales, Llanelli’s festive celebrations are a joint effort by Carmarthenshire County Council, Llanelli Town Council, Llanelli Rural Council and Llanelli Round Table.

Partners have expressed their disappointment at the decision but have vowed to keep Christmas spirit alive.

Cllr Peter Hughes Griffiths, Carmarthenshire County Council’s Executive Board Member for Culture, Sport and Tourism, said: “We have made this decision with a very heavy heart as we know how much the carnival means to the people of Llanelli. This is the first time since it started over 40 years ago that we have had to take a decision like this and we are as disappointed as I’m sure everyone else will be.

“We are determined to do something special to keep the tradition alive and planning is now underway to hold a virtual carnival on what would have been the night of the traditional festivities.”

Cllr Shahana Najmi, Leader of Llanelli Town Council said: “The Llanelli Christmas Carnival is the highlight in the calendar for thousands of people and whilst we’re sorry we can’t hold the traditional carnival this year, we are pleased to be working with partners on an online celebration which we hope people will get involved with and enjoy.”

Cllr Tegwen Devichand, Leader of Llanelli Rural Council, said: “Generations of families have enjoyed Llanelli’s Christmas carnival over the years and we’re disappointed that for this first time in its history we are unable to put on the parade. We hope people will understand the decision and support the plans we’re developing for the town’s first virtual carnival.”

Roger Bowen, of Llanelli Round Table, added: “Llanelli’s carnival night is an important night as it raises a great amount of money for local charities and brings many communities together with such tremendous work on the floats, which really makes the evening such a special event.  We hope that people will find other ways to give generously and support good causes in our communities.”

Further information will be released in the coming weeks about the virtual carnival and how people can get involved.

Keep an eye on Carmarthenshire County Council’s Facebook and Twitter feeds and visit newsroom.carmarthenshire.gov.wales

Continue Reading

Trending

FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK